Are
we on a sustainable path? To answer this question, we must first understand
what sustainability is. According to Wikipedia, sustainability is the capacity to endure renewal, maintenance, and
sustenance, or nourishment in contrast to durability, it’s the capacity to
endure unchanging resistance to change.
In relation to this, sustainable development,
according to the World Commission on Environment and Development, is a development
that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs. So now, the question is: “Can we continue living our current lifestyles
without compromising the quality of life in the future?”
Do we think there will be enough
resources left for the future generations if we continue our lavish ways of
life today? When we leave the world, would we be proud because we did something
worth our short time on earth; something to make the life of the future people
easier for them by producing innovative technology they could use? Or would we
leave them with more crisis than we are facing right now?
I believe that if we continue living
this way—extravagant, wasteful, and over-the-top, we won’t be able to leave
this world without compromising the quality of life for the future. As I witnessed
from a film we viewed recently called “The Inconvenient Truth,” if we continue
this way of inhabiting earth, not much will be left for the future generations.
What’s worse, we might all be eradicated within 50 years if we continue living
at this rate.
Though the truth is indeed, very inconvenient,
many people are now aware of the possible consequences our actions today might
bring to the next generations and they are trying to do something about it.
In my immediate community, which is
in Santa Rosa City, I don’t think we are living sustainably right now. Like most
communities today, we tend to use more than what we really need, consume more
than what is supposed to be spent; we never seem to be content with what we
have. To combat future problems regarding sustainability like shortages,
environmental dilemmas, and the like, the government here in Santa Rosa tried
to implement projects that aim to delay negative effects of our lavish way of
life. Some of these projects are banning plastics, waste segregation and
recycling programs.
In order to leave a sustainable
environment for the future generations, we must be aware of the consequences of
our actions today to the people and world tomorrow. We must keep in mind that
the world is not really ours so we must leave it in better condition than we
came here instead of leaving it worn out and barely or not livable at all for
the people of the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment